The Rise and Fall of the Aramaeans in the Ancient Near East, From Their First Appearance Until 732 BCE by Reinhold Gotthard G. G

Author:Reinhold, Gotthard G. G.
Language: eng
Format: epub
Publisher: Peter Lang AG

See Maria Giula Amadasi Guzzo, TELL AFIS IN THE IRON AGE: The Aramaic Inscriptions, ASOR NEA 77/1 2014, 54–57, spec. 54/55; K. Lawson Younger, Some of What’s New in Old Aramaic Epigraphy, ASOR NEA 70/3 2007, 139–146, spec. 139; Aren M. Maeir, Review of Jonathan Miles Robker, The Jehu Revolution: A Royal Tradition oft he Northern Kingdom and Its Ramifications, RBL [www.bookreviews.org] (2015).

190For development of the Aramaean city-states in Sam’al, see in particular Ralf-B. Wartke, SAMʼAL. Ein aramäsicher Stadtstaat des 10. bis 8. Jhs. v.Chr. und die Geschichte seiner Erforschung (Mainz: Philipp von Zabern, 2005), esp. 57–90.

191See Efrem Yildez, “Los Arameos de Lu’aš y Hamat” Arabismo.com ano 2001, 1–10.

192E. Lipinski, „The Assyrian Campaign to Masuate in 796 B.C. And the Zakir stela,“, AION 31 1971: 393–399, esp. 397 ff.

193W. T. Pitard, 1987, 174; S. Hafthórsson, 2006, 65–66. E. Lipinski is dating the events, which are recording about the siege of Hazrak, to the year 796 B.C.! See E. Lipinki, LAOS 3 2013: 139: “The purpose of the Assyrian campaign to Mansuate in 796 was to rescue Zakkur, besieged in Hadrk/Hatarikka (Tell al-Afis) by a coalition led by Bar-Hadad II of Damascus and by the king of Arpad, who may now be securely identified with Bar Hadad, son of Attarsumki I.” But here it's evidently, that E.Lipinski is not involved in the new researches to the Bar Hadad stela from Bureij/Aleppo! See L.J. Mykytiuk (2009, 2012, 2015) and G.G.G. Reinhold (Excursus II)!

194Stefan Beyerle also considers the strengthening of Urartu and military involvement of Assyria; See Beyerle, 2009, 56/57.

195So Marcus Wäfler, “Zum assyrisch-urartäischen Westkonflikt,” APA 11, no.12 (1980): 79–97.

196See already Gotthard G.G. Reinhold, Diss. 196 and 249–265 (Zakkur Stela-inscription). S. Hasegawa, BZAW Bd. 434, Berlin/Boston 2012, 63 leaves open a defined chronology of these events: “The siege took place either at the end of the ninth or at the beginning of the eight century BCE.” But, he favours the date 804/03 BCE., ibid, 102/103: “Adad-nerari III's 804/3 BCE campaign forced this coalition to hurry northwards in order to defend their homeland and thus Hamath was saved.” “This dating seems the most probable because it produces no conflict with the descriptions in the Assyrian inscriptions” and: “Provided that the siege of Hadrach took place in 804/3 BCE, the absence of Joahaz from among the besieging troops in the Zakkur Inscription may indicate the the Kingdom of Israel did not take part in the siege. It might show that Joahaz had already attempted to throw off the Damascene yoke, by refusing to participate in the anti-Assyrian coalition.”

197See V. Donbaz (1990, 8 ff., 14 ff.) and Nili Wazzana (2001, 696 ff.). For the political situation I refer to Gershon Galil (1992, 55 ff.), Carlo Zaccagnini (1993, 53 ff.), Stefan Beyerle (2009, 61 ff.) and S. Hasegawa(2012, 97 ff., 101, 135: Eponym Chronicles).

198To this insecurity of this king's reign see also Gunnar Lehmann (2008, 148).

199See especially Stefan Timm, König Hesion II. von Damascus (WdO; Göttingen:Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1993): 55–84, esp. 81–83.

200See already note 90 and the

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.